Monthly Archives: May 2022

CELEX:62021TA0281: Case T-281/21: Judgment of the General Court of 16 March 2022 — Nowhere v EUIPO — Ye (APE TEES) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark APE TEES — Earlier national non-registered figurative trade marks representing an ape — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Rules governing common-law actions for passing-off — Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and Euratom)

CELEX:62020TA0456: Case T-456/20: Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2022 — LA v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Recruitment — Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 — Decision of the Selection Board to exclude the applicant from the next phase of the competition — Criteria to assess professional experience — Compliance of criteria applied by the Selection Board with the competition notice)

CELEX:62020CA0433: Case C-433/20: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 24 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien — Austria) — Austro-Mechana Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung mechanisch-musikalischer Urheberrechte Gesellschaft mbH v Strato AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society — Directive 2001/29/EC — Article 2 — Reproduction — Article 5(2)(b) — Private copying exception — Concept of ‘any medium’ — Servers owned by third parties made available to natural persons for private use — Fair compensation — National legislation that does not make the providers of cloud computing services subject to the private copying levy)

CELEX:62020TA0333: Case T-333/20: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — Fidia farmaceutici v EUIPO — Giuliani (IALO TSP) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark IALO TSP — Earlier international word mark HYALO — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Identification of a member of the Board of Appeal — Article 165(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

CELEX:62020CA0245: Case C-245/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Midden-Nederland — Netherlands) — X, Z v Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Competence of the supervisory authority — Article 55(3) — Processing operations of courts acting in their judicial capacity — Concept — Making available to a journalist of documents arising from court proceedings containing personal data)

CELEX:62021TA0252: Case T-252/21: Judgment of the General Court of 23 March 2022 — Hrebenyuk v EUIPO (Shape of a stand-up collar) (EU trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of a stand-up collar — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

CELEX:62021CN0744: Case C-744/21 P: Appeal brought on 2 December 2021 by Henry Cotton’s Brand Management Co. Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 22 September 2021 in Case T-173/20, Henry Cotton’s Brand Management v EUIPO — Industries Sportswear

CELEX:62020TA0249: Case T-249/20: Judgment of the General Court of 16 March 2022 — Sabra v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Errors of assessment — Criterion of a leading businessperson operating in Syria — Presumption of a link with the Syrian regime — Rebuttal of the presumption)

CELEX:62021CN0743: Case C-743/21 P: Appeal brought on 2 December 2021 by Marina Yachting Brand Management Co. Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 22 September 2021 in Case T-169/20, Marina Yachting Brand Management v EUIPO — Industries Sportswear

CELEX:62020CA0151: Case C-151/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde v Nordzucker AG, Südzucker AG, Agrana Zucker GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Competition — Article 101 TFEU — Cartel prosecuted by two national competition authorities — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 50 — Non bis in idem principle — Existence of the same offence — Article 52(1) — Limitations to the non bis in idem principle — Conditions — Pursuit of an objective of general interest — Proportionality)