Monthly Archives: September 2022

CELEX:62020TA0278: Case T-278/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — Zhejiang Hangtong Machinery Manufacture and Ningbo Hi-Tech Zone Tongcheng Auto Parts v Commission (Dumping — Imports of steel road wheels originating in China — Imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitive collection of the provisional duty — Articles 17(4), 18 and 20 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 — Lack of cooperation — Insufficient information provided to the Commission)

CELEX:62020TA0246: Case T-246/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — Aerospinning Master Franchising v EUIPO — Mad Dogg Athletics (SPINNING) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark SPINNING — Trade mark which has become the common name in the trade for a product or service in respect of which it is registered — Article 51(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Relevant public)

CELEX:62020TA0179: Case T-179/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — JP v Commission (Civil service — Open competition — Notice of Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 for the recruitment of administrators in the field of taxation (AD 7) — Non-inclusion on the reserve list — Composition of the selection board — Stability — Manifest error of assessment — Liability)

CELEX:62020TA0150: Case T-150/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2022 — Tartu Agro v Commission (State aid — Agriculture — Lease contract for agricultural land in Estonia — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Advantage — Determination of the market price — Private operator principle — Complex economic assessments — Judicial review — Taking into account of all relevant factors — Duty of care)

CELEX:62019TA0886: Case T-886/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2022 — Design Light & Led Made in Europe and Design Luce & Led Made in Italy v Commission (Competition — Abuse of dominant position — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — LED lighting sector — Patent Licensing Program — Decision rejecting a complaint — Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 — Manifest error of assessment — Duty to state reasons — No EU interest — Probability of being able to establish the existence of an infringement)

CELEX:62019TA0388: Case T-388/19: Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — Puigdemont i Casamajó and Comín i Oliveres v Parliament (Law governing the institutions — Members of the European Parliament — Refusal of the President of the Parliament to recognise the status of Member of the European Parliament and the associated rights of elected candidates — Action for annulment — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility)

CELEX:62018TA0280: Case T-280/18: Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — ABLV Bank v SRB (Economic and monetary union — Banking union — Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail — Decision of the SRB not to adopt a resolution scheme — Action for annulment — Act adversely affecting a person — Interest in bringing proceedings — Standing to bring proceedings — Inadmissibility in part — Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 — Power of the author of the measure — Right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Proportionality — Equal treatment)

CELEX:62022CN0494: Case C-494/22 P: Appeal brought on 22 July 2022 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 11 May 2022 in Case T-151/20 Czech Republic v Commission

CELEX:62022CN0194: Case C-194/22 P: Appeal brought on 4 March 2022 by Magic Box Int. Toys SLU against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 21 December 2021 in Case T-549/20, Magic Box Int. Toys v EUIPO — KMA Concepts

CELEX:62022CB0025: Case C-25/22: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht — Austria) — CM v Finanzamt Österreich (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred — Lack of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)