Monthly Archives: April 2022

CELEX:62021CJ0249: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#Fuhrmann-2-GmbH v B.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Bottrop.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2011/83/EU – Article 8(2) – Distance contracts concluded by electronic means – Information requirements for the trader – Activation of a button or a similar function in order to place the order with an obligation to pay – Unambiguous formulation corresponding to the words ‘order with obligation to pay’ – Taking account only of the words on the button or similar function for the purposes of assessing the ‘corresponding’ nature of such a formulation.#Case C-249/21.

CELEX:62020CJ0228: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#I GmbH v Finanzamt H.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Niedersächsisches Finanzgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 132(1)(b) – Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest – Exemption for hospital and medical care – Private hospital – Duly recognised establishment – Comparable social conditions.#Case C-228/20.

CELEX:62020CJ0568: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#J v H Limited.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Scope – Article 2(a) – Concept of ‘judgment’ – Order for payment made in another Member State after a summary contested examination of a judgment given in a third State – Article 39 – Enforceability in Member States.#Case C-568/20.

CELEX:62020CJ0236: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#PG v Ministero della Giustizia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Emilia Romagna.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clauses 2 and 4 – Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Magistrates and ordinary judges – Clause 5 – Measures intended to penalise improper use of fixed-term contracts – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7 – Paid annual leave.#Case C-236/20.

CELEX:62020CJ0489: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#UB v Kauno teritorinė muitinė.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Union Customs Code – Extinguishment of the customs debt – Goods unlawfully introduced into the customs territory of the European Union – Seizure and confiscation – Directive 2008/118/EC – Excise duties – Directive 2006/112/EC – Value added tax – Chargeable event – Chargeability.#Case C-489/20.

CELEX:62020CJ0333: Sodba Sodišča (peti senat) z dne 7. aprila 2022.#Berlin Chemie A. Menarini SRL proti Administraţia Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Mijlocii Bucureşti – Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Predhodno odločanje – Davek na dodano vrednost (DDV) – Direktiva 2006/112/ES – Člen 44 – Kraj opravljanja storitev – Izvedbena uredba (EU) št. 282/2011 – Člen 11(1) – Opravljanje storitev – Kraj, ki je davčno upoštevna navezna okoliščina – Pojem ,stalna poslovna enota‘ – Družba države članice, ki je vključena v družbo s sedežem v drugi državi članici – Ustrezno strukturirani človeški in tehnični viri – Zmožnost prejeti in uporabljati storitve za lastne potrebe stalne poslovne enote – Storitve trženja, regulacije, oglaševanja in zastopanja, ki jih za družbo prejemnico opravlja povezana družba.#Zadeva C-333/20.

CELEX:62020CJ0228: Sodba Sodišča (drugi senat) z dne 7. aprila 2022.#I GmbH proti Finanzamt H.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Niedersächsisches Finanzgericht.#Predhodno odločanje – Skupni sistem davka na dodano vrednost (DDV) – Direktiva 2006/112/ES – Člen 132(1)(b) – Oprostitve za določene dejavnosti, ki so v javnem interesu – Oprostitev za bolnišnično in zdravstveno oskrbo – Zasebna bolnišnica – Ustrezno priznana ustanova – Primerljivi socialni pogoji.#Zadeva C-228/20.

CELEX:62020CJ0236: Sodba Sodišča (prvi senat) z dne 7. aprila 2022.#PG proti Ministero della Giustizia in drugi.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Emilia Romagna.#Predhodno odločanje – Socialna politika – Okvirni sporazum o delu za določen čas, sklenjen med ETUC, UNICE in CEEP – Določbi 2 in 4 – Okvirni sporazum o delu s krajšim delovnim časom, sklenjen med UNICE, CEEP in ETUC – Določba 4 – Načelo prepovedi diskriminacije – Enako obravnavanje pri zaposlovanju in delu – Mirovni sodniki in redni sodniki – Določba 5 – Ukrepi za sankcioniranje zlorabe pogodb za določen čas – Direktiva 2003/88/ES – Člen 7 – Plačani letni dopust.#Zadeva C-236/20.

CELEX:62020CJ0489: Sodba Sodišča (drugi senat) z dne 7. aprila 2022.#UB proti Kauno teritorinė muitinė.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Predhodno odločanje – Carinski zakonik Unije – Ugasnitev carinskega dolga – Blago, ki je bilo nezakonito vneseno na carinsko območje Unije – Zaseg in odvzem – Direktiva 2008/118/ES – Trošarine – Direktiva 2006/112/ES – Davek na dodano vrednost – Obdavčljivi dogodek – Obveznost obračuna.#Zadeva C-489/20.

CELEX:62021TJ0116: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#Maternus GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-116/21.