Monthly Archives: April 2022

CELEX:62021CA0183: Case C-183/21: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken — Germany) — Maxxus Group GmbH & Co. KG v Globus Holding GmbH & Co. KG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Trade marks — Directive (EU) 2015/2436 — Article 19 — Genuine use of a trade mark — Burden of proof — Application to revoke for non-use — National procedural rule obliging the applicant to carry out market research concerning use of the mark)

CELEX:62021CA0060: Case C-60/21: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 March 2022 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Article 45 TFEU — Article 28 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area — Free movement of workers — Direct taxation — Income tax — Deductions — Maintenance annuities — Equal treatment — Discrimination between resident and non-resident taxpayers)

CELEX:62020CA0177: Case C-177/20: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Győri Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — ‘Grossmania’ Mezőgazdasági Termelő és Szolgáltató Kft. v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Principles of EU law — Primacy — Direct effect — Sincere cooperation — Article 4(3) TEU — Article 63 TFEU — Obligations of a Member State as a result of a preliminary ruling — Interpretation of a provision of EU law given by the Court in a preliminary ruling — Obligation to give full effect to EU law — Obligation for a national court to disapply national legislation which contravenes EU law as interpreted by the Court — Administrative decision which became final in the absence of a challenge before the courts — Principles of equivalence and effectiveness — Liability of the Member State)

CELEX:62020TA0134: Case T-134/20: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — Huhtamaki v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a State aid investigation — Advance tax agreements — Refusal of access — Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party — Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits — General presumption of confidentiality — Not irrebuttable — Obligation to state reasons)

CELEX:62022TN0072: Case T-72/22: Action brought on 4 February 2022 — Interneto žiniasklaidos asociacija and Others v Commission

CELEX:62021TA0171: Case T-171/21: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — Ubisoft Entertainment v EUIPO — Huawei Technologies (FOR HONOR) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark FOR HONOR — Earlier EU word mark HONOR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

CELEX:62019TA0806: Case T-806/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2022 — Govern d’Andorra v EUIPO (Andorra) (European Union trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark Andorra — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

CELEX:62019TA0636: Case T-636/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2022 — Chemours Netherlands v ECHA (REACH — Substances of very high concern — Establishment of a candidate list of substances for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Decision identifying 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-2-(heptafluoropropoxy)propionic acid, its salts and its acyl halides as a substance fulfilling the criteria laid down for inclusion in the list — Article 57 of Regulation No 1907/2006 — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality)

CELEX:62021TA0149: Case T-149/21: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — UGA Nutraceuticals v EUIPO — Vitae Health Innovation (VITADHA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark VITADHA — Earlier Spanish word mark VITANADH — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

CELEX:62022TB0046: Case T-46/22 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 3 March 2022 — Esedra v Parliament (Interim measures — Public service contracts — Early childhood care services — Application for interim measures — Lack of urgency)